We Often Hear The Term: “Constitutional Crisis.” What Is It? What Does It Mean To American Government and the Nation?
A Constitutional Crisis occurs when there is a severe problem in the function of a government due to a conflict between different branches of government, a violation or challenge to the constitution, or a situation where the constitution does not provide a clear resolution. Such crises often arise in moments of political instability, legal ambiguity, or when government officials refuse to abide by constitutional limits.
Types of Constitutional Crises:
Conflict Between Branches of Government – When the executive, legislative, or judicial branches disagree on the extent of their powers, leading to a standoff.
Example: The U.S. Supreme Court orders an action, but the president refuses to comply.
Failure to Adhere to Constitutional Processes – When government officials violate constitutional rules without clear consequences.
Example: A president refusing to leave office after losing an election.
Constitutional Ambiguity – When the constitution does not provide guidance for an unprecedented situation.
Example: A close presidential election with disputed results and no clear constitutional resolution.
Public or Institutional Breakdown – When citizens, law enforcement, or the military refuse to recognize constitutional authority.
Example: A military coup that disregards the constitutional government.
A constitutional crisis can lead to significant political instability, a loss of public trust in government, or, in extreme cases, the breakdown of democratic institutions.
Will A Constitutional Crisis Occur Simply Because Congress and the President Disagree?
A Constitutional Crisis does not occur simply because different branches of government disagree. Disagreements between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches are a normal and expected part of a constitutional system with checks and balances. However, a disagreement can escalate into a constitutional crisis if it results in:
A Breakdown of Constitutional Processes – If one branch refuses to follow a lawful decision or ruling from another, leading to a constitutional impasse.
Example: A president refuses to abide by a Supreme Court ruling, effectively nullifying judicial authority.
Institutional Paralysis – If the branches are so divided that essential government functions cannot continue.
Example: A legislature is unable to confirm a president’s cabinet or judicial nominees indefinitely, preventing the government from operating.
Unconstitutional Overreach – If one branch exceeds its constitutional authority without a clear remedy.
Example: A president dissolves the legislature without legal grounds, violating constitutional separation of powers.
Failure to Enforce Constitutional Rules – If government officials refuse to recognize constitutional authority or enforce laws.
Example: A sitting president loses an election but refuses to leave office, and no institution is able or willing to enforce the transition of power.
Key Distinction:
Ordinary disputes between government branches are part of a functioning democracy.
A constitutional crisis happens when those disputes cannot be resolved through legal or institutional means or when one branch acts beyond its legal limits without accountability.
Thus, disagreement alone does not create a constitutional crisis, but an unresolved conflict that threatens constitutional governance can.
Can a disagreement Over Investigation Between the President and Congress, Cause a “Constitutional Crisis?”
A disagreement over the President’s authority to order an investigation into spending fraud and better use of taxpayer money does not, by itself, constitute a constitutional crisis. However, it could lead to one if certain conditions are met. Here’s how:
Normal Disagreement (Not a Crisis)
If Congress, the courts, or other government agencies challenge the scope of the President’s investigative authority, but the dispute is resolved through normal legal and political processes, it remains a standard separation of powers issue.
Example: If Congress believes the President’s order oversteps executive authority, they can challenge it in court or pass legislation to limit it.
When Disagreement Becomes a Constitutional Crisis
A constitutional crisis could arise if:
- The President ignores a court ruling – If a federal court rules that the President does not have this power but the executive branch proceeds with the investigation anyway.
- Congress refuses to fund or recognize the investigation – If Congress determines the order is unconstitutional and blocks funding or refuses to comply, leading to a governmental standoff.
- Federal agencies refuse to follow orders – If law enforcement (e.g., DOJ, FBI) refuses to carry out the investigation, arguing the President does not have unilateral authority, it could lead to an enforcement crisis.
- Impeachment proceedings or executive defiance – If Congress moves to impeach the President for alleged abuse of power, or if the President retaliates against Congress in an unconstitutional manner (e.g., dissolving Congress or refusing to follow oversight laws).
- A breakdown in legal enforcement – If different government agencies recognize conflicting authorities, leading to uncertainty in legal governance (e.g., one branch says the investigation is legal, another says it is not, and law enforcement does not know whom to follow).
Historical Precedents
Watergate (1970s) – President Nixon’s attempt to obstruct an investigation led to a crisis when he defied the Supreme Court and ordered the firing of the special prosecutor.
Andrew Jackson & the Supreme Court (1832) – Jackson refused to enforce a Supreme Court decision, famously stating, “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.”
Trump & Congressional Subpoenas (2019-2021) – Disputes over executive authority to investigate and withhold information from Congress led to court battles, but because the system processed these disputes legally, they did not escalate into a full-blown crisis.
If the branches use legal mechanisms (courts, Congress, negotiations) to resolve the dispute, it remains a normal constitutional disagreement.
If one branch refuses to comply with constitutional processes, leading to a governmental breakdown, it could escalate into a constitutional crisis.
At this stage, it appears to be a power struggle, but if it escalates into legal defiance or institutional paralysis, it could turn into a constitutional crisis.
Sources and Citations:
The following are sources and citations that support the definitions, historical precedents, and analysis of constitutional crises, executive authority, and separation of powers.
Definition of Constitutional Crisis
Sources:
- Levinson, Sanford. Constitutional Faith. Princeton University Press, 1988.
- Ackerman, Bruce. We the People: Transformations. Harvard University Press, 2000.
- Tribe, Laurence. American Constitutional Law. Foundation Press, 1978.
Key Points:
- Constitutional crises arise when there is a breakdown in the function of government due to an unresolved constitutional conflict.
- They differ from routine political disagreements because they threaten the legitimacy or operation of constitutional governance.
Separation of Powers and Presidential Authority
Sources:
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers. 1788.
Federalist No. 47-51 (Madison’s discussion on checks and balances).
U.S. Supreme Court cases:
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952). Ruled that the president cannot seize private industry without congressional approval.
United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974). Established limits on executive privilege and compelled Nixon to release Watergate tapes.
Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998). Struck down the presidential line-item veto, reinforcing the separation of powers.
Key Points:
- The executive branch has investigative powers, but these powers are limited by the judiciary and legislative branches.
- Any unilateral presidential action beyond statutory or constitutional authority can be challenged in court.
Historical Examples of Constitutional Crises
Sources:
- Schlesinger, Arthur M. The Imperial Presidency. Houghton Mifflin, 1973. Details cases of executive overreach leading to constitutional conflicts.
- Woodward, Bob. The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court. Simon & Schuster, 1979. Covers the judicial battles during the Nixon era.
- U.S. Senate Historical Office (www.senate.gov) Provides primary source documents on constitutional crises, including Nixon, Watergate, and impeachment proceedings.
Key Examples:
Watergate Scandal (1972-1974) Nixon’s refusal to comply with subpoenas led to a constitutional crisis that was resolved by judicial enforcement and congressional impeachment efforts.
*(See: United States v. Nixon, 1974).
Andrew Jackson vs. Supreme Court (1832) Jackson ignored Worcester v. Georgia, effectively challenging judicial authority.
*(Source: Schlesinger, The Age of Jackson, 1945).
Trump and Congressional Investigations (2019-2021) Refusals to comply with congressional subpoenas led to legal battles but were ultimately resolved through the courts.
*(Source: House Judiciary Committee reports, Congressional Record, http://www.congress.gov).
Can Disagreements Lead to a Constitutional Crisis?
Sources:
- Fisher, Louis. Presidential War Power. University Press of Kansas, 2004.
- Strauss, David. The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2010.
- Harvard Law Review. “When Do Disputes Become Constitutional Crises?” Vol. 126, 2013.
Key Points:
Normal disagreements do not constitute a crisis unless legal mechanisms fail or a branch refuses to comply with constitutional limits. When a dispute escalates into defiance of the Constitution without resolution, it may become a crisis.These sources provide historical precedent, legal rulings, and scholarly analysis on constitutional crises, executive power, and separation of powers.
See The 37 Published Books of Robert Clifton Robinson
Categories: Robert Clifton Robinson


Please see, "Guidelines For Debate," at the right-side menu. Post your comment or argument here: