Bart Ehrman is considered by many as one of the world’s most preeminent New Testament scholars. The problem is that Ehrman doesn’t believe the New Testament is true, that God exists, or that the writers of the New Testament have told us the truth about Jesus. The problem with Bart Ehrman is that he rarely presents any evidence to support his suppositions and criticisms of the New Testament. What we do find when reading the books and essays written by Ehrman, are his opinions about the New Testament. These are not scholarly, evidentiary conclusions, but personal beliefs as an atheist.
We might ask why a man would seek to obtain a Phd and become a New Testament scholar, if he doesn’t believe God exists in the first place? The answer is quite obvious. There is tremendous academic and financial recognition for anyone who claims to be a former evangelical Christian, and is now an atheist. Bart Ehrman achieved international acclaim and became a very wealthy man by assuming this role for himself.
If we conduct a personal examination of the persons who are held up as critical scholars, we learn that many are atheists who do not believe God exists, or that the Bible is true. It is not difficult to imagine why a person who doesn’t believe in God, would want to acquire an advanced education that would enable them to be recognized as a New Testament scholar. The adversaries of Jesus and His Gospel have used many tactics in order to try and impeach His death and resurrection. Peter spoke of these false teachers who spread lies.
But there were also false prophets in Israel (then), just as there will be false teachers among you (now). ~2 Peter 2:1
There are many like Bart Ehrman who freely admit they are an atheist, and don’t believe the New Testament, while asking us to believe them when they assure us that the New Testament is not a reliable narrative of Jesus. Would you go to a doctor who told you ahead of time that he doesn’t believe in medicine? Why would anyone believe a Biblical scholar who does not believe the Bible, or that God exists?
New Testament Scholarship is not biased, but many New Testament Scholars are. Every human being is capable of cognitive prejudice. People tend to choose their preferred conclusions, and then justify their choices by fallacious reasoning.
Bart Ehrman has over 30 books currently for sale on Amazon. With four New York Times Bestsellers, Dr. Ehrman is described as having a net worth between two and eight million dollars.
Although Ehrman defines himself as an atheist, it is unclear why he would seek to achieve a doctorate in Divinity only to use his education to refute and discredit Jesus. The entire point of gaining knowledge of the Bible is to be able to communicate the truth of who Jesus is to the world.
What we discover about atheist scholars is that their views of the Bible is skewed by their idea that God doesn’t exist. You might be surprised to learn that atheist New Testament scholars don’t study the actual texts of the New Testament to learn what it says; they study each other and the secular literary methods that are currently being used to try and impeach the New Testament.
Modern scholars often use methods known as “textual, source, form,” and “literary criticism,” in evaluating the New Testament. Unfortunately, these modern methods do not add to our knowledge of the scriptures, they detract and often confuse the texts. These modern methods of interpreting the New Testament were allegedly created to help us understand the New Testament narratives, but they do not accomplish this goal. The methods used by these modern processes, compare the New Testament texts with other ancient works of literature in order to determine whether or not they should be considered reliable.
Everything that results from the false and inaccurate premise of the modern atheist scholar, permits the thousands of errors that these atheist scholars publish each year, deceiving unknowing readers. Errors that a majority of people are not aware of.
It would have been better that after Dr. Ehrman discovered he no longer believed in Christ, that he chose a different career. By remaining a New Testament Scholar and writing books that cause people to reject Jesus and lose their salvation, he has assigned himself to the same destiny as Judas Iscariot.
Jesus said: Woe to the world because of offenses! For offenses must come, but woe to that man by whom the offense comes! ~Matthew 18:7
Jesus said: For the Son of Man must die, as the Scriptures declared long ago. But how terrible it will be for the one who betrays him. It would be far better for that man if he had never been born!” ~Matthew 26:24
The definition of a mercenary is one who is conducting themselves in a particular field for the purpose of financial gain. It is impossible to trust the criticism and conclusions of a man or woman who does not believe God exists and yet writes books as an authority on the Bible.
The following essays are written as an impeachment of Bart Ehrman and his many assertions that are presented, without evidence, claiming the New Testament is not true, and Jesus did not say a majority of all that is written about Him in these narratives.
- What Jesus Really Said About Heaven and Hell: According To Bart Ehrman
- Bart Ehrman Is Wrong That Acts 4:13 Proves Peter Was Illiterate
- The Errors Of Liberal Scholars In Disregarding Evidence
- A Demonstration In The Lack Of Knowledge By Liberal New Testament Scholars
- Were The Gospels Written By Eyewitnesses?
- New Testament Reliability: Eyewitnesses And Liars
- Were The Four Gospels Written Anonymously?
- When Were The Gospels Written?
- Has The Text Of The New Testament Been Changed?
- Alleged Textual Variants Of The New Testament Do Not Change The Narrative
- Is The New Testament A Valid Historical Narrative?
- “The New Testament Was Written Late In The First Century”
- Artifacts Of The New Testament That Prove Its Authenticity
- Historical, Evidentiary Proof Of New Testament Reliability
- Historical Evidence That Proves The Resurrection Of Jesus
- The Promise Of Resurrection: Ten Prophecies Of Messiah Rising From The Dead
- Saul Of Tarsus: Compelling Evidence For The Resurrection Of Jesus
- New Testament Scholars Teaching Errors To Students
- How Liberal New Testament Scholars Deceive The World Today
- A List Of Conservative And Liberal Bible Scholars
- Are There Sources For Jesus Outside The New Testament?
- Is The New Testament Filled With Errors?
- The Synoptic Problem