Are We On The Verge Of A Seven Year Peace Plan—Specified By The Prophecy Of Daniel 9:27?

The Peace Plan that is currently in process between many nations and Israel, fits all the criteria for the Daniel 9:27 prophecy of one seven year period remaining in Daniel’s prophecy. The context fits the same literal-grammatical-historical hermeneutic that Daniel’s prophecy itself demands. In this essay we will unpack this idea with full precision, in light of the pattern of the first sixty-nine weeks, and then assess why the current developments under President Trump (and allied nations) may indeed represent the incipient stage of the covenant Daniel foresaw.

UPDATE: October 13, 2025

Today during the signing of the Trump Peace Plan, in Egypt, I realized that we might have been wrong about the requirement for a Peace Plan that must specify seven years. Daniel’s prophecy doesn’t say this, it says:

Daniel 9:27 “Then he shall confirm a covenant (of peace) with many (nations) for one week (7 years)..”

The “one week,” is a code phrase for the “70th week of Daniel, the Seven Year Tribulation. In other worlds, the Peace Plan itself may not specify that it is for seven years, but the Prophecy specifies that this Peace Plan will be for the 70th week, the Tribulation Daniel and Jesus described.

The Hermeneutical Foundation: A Literal Fulfillment of the First 69 Weeks

The first sixty-nine “weeks” (483 years) were fulfilled literally — to the very day — from the decree to restore Jerusalem (Neh 2, in Artaxerxes’ 20th year, 445 BC) to the presentation of Messiah the Prince at His Triumphal Entry (Nisan 10, April 6, 32 AD).

The Key to all Bible Prophecy: Daniel Chapter 9

This exact precision was demonstrated by Sir Robert Anderson (The Coming Prince, 1894), who calculated:

• 69 × 7 × 360 = 173,880 days
• 445 BC → 32 AD = 173,880 days = April 6, 32 AD, the Day Jesus rode into Jerusalem and was proclaimed the Messiah.

For this reason, the current peace plan, if it is for a duration of seven years fits the literal chronology of Daniel 9:27, and is not figurative. If the first 69 weeks were literal, the 70th week must be also — seven actual years.

The abrupt change to a “figurative” reading (as many modern commentators propose) has no textual warrant. The same Hebrew idiom shabuʿa (שָׁבוּעַ) means a literal heptad of years in all 70 instances in Daniel. The angel Gabriel gave Daniel an exact prophetic calendar, not allegory.

The Prophetic Pause Between the 69th and 70th Weeks

The text itself implies an intervening gap (“After the sixty-two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, and … the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary,” Dan 9:26). The destruction of Jerusalem (70 AD) happened after the 69th week but before the 70th begins — establishing a prophetic parenthesis (the Church Age).

This gap perfectly accounts for nearly 2,000 years of Gentile dominion (Luke 21:24), which aligns with Paul’s mystery of Israel’s partial hardening “until the fullness of the Gentiles comes in” (Rom 11:25).

The 70th Week: A Future, Literal Seven-Year Covenant

A Covenant With “Many” (at least 14 nations)

1. Israel is the most concretely committed, insofar as its leadership moves to implement phases.
2. India is a significant non-Middle East backer, at least in public statements.
3. Saudi Arabia — its foreign minister is among those said to have expressed support.
4. Jordan — statements from Jordan welcomed the plan as a “positive step.”
5. United Arab Emirates (UAE) — pressing Israel to back the plan and publicly supportive.
6. Qatar — welcomed Hamas’s response and supports the initiative.
7. Egypt — is listed among the Arab states that have “welcomed” the plan.
8. Turkey — though not Arab, it is a Muslim-majority country included among supporters in statements.
9. Indonesia — also included in lists of nations supporting the plan.
10. France,
11. Germany,
12. Russia,
13. UK, are all on record as supporters or endorsers of the Peace Plan.
14. Hamas’s acceptance is the most volatile — while some reports claim it has agreed to the plan under certain terms, that agreement is highly tentative and contested internally.

So in biblical prophetic terms, the number of signatories are, “many,” fitting what Daniel 9:27 specifies. If this peace plan is to be a candidate for the “covenant with many nations,” it fits Daniels criteria.

“He shall confirm a covenant with many for one week.” (Dan 9:27)

The subject “he” naturally refers to the prince that shall come (v. 26) — i.e., the world ruler from out of the “sea,” an allusion to former nations under the Roman Empire (a gentile). For this reason, the covenant will likely be brokered or confirmed by a Western-aligned leader with global authority — fitting today’s geopolitical stage of a revived Western coalition.

Why Does This Matter?

If this is the Seven Year Peace Treaty specified by Daniel 9:27, it will likely be the beginning of the Seven Year Tribulation Period. The Removal of Jesus’ Church, specified by 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18, will take place, either just before, or just after, the beginning of the Seven Year Tribulation.

NOTE: If the Peace Plan is not for SEVEN YEARS, it cannot be Daniel’s prophecy

That covenant explicitly involves Israel and “many nations”, which is precisely what is occurring under the Trump-Netanyahu peace framework — normalization and mutual defense pacts between Israel and surrounding (and global) powers.

See The Book That Details The Seven Year Peace Treaty, As Described By Daniel, Jesus, and The Book of Revelation: “Days of Wrath: The Final Sign“

Click on the Image to Look Inside the Book

Sources and Citations

Key Source: White House “Global Support” Statement

The White House issued a public document titled “Global Support for President Trump’s Bold Vision for Peace in Gaza” on October 1, 2025, which states: “The Foreign Ministers of the State of Qatar, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, Pakistan, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt … welcome President Donald J. Trump’s leadership … and assert their confidence … in his proposal to end the war, rebuild Gaza … and advance a comprehensive peace.”

This is perhaps the clearest listed “in principle support” by multiple states, in their capacity as foreign ministers.

Reporting in Arab / Islamic Media & International Press

Al Jazeera reported that several Arab and regional states, as well as the Palestinian Authority, welcomed the U.S. President’s 21-point peace plan. That same article includes that the Palestinian Authority joined in welcoming the plan. Al Jazeera notes that Israel’s Netanyahu “welcomed the proposal” and that the “new proposal, which calls for the disarmament of Hamas, has been welcomed by the Palestinian Authority … along with some regional Arab countries.”

Specific National Statements

India / Narendra Modi: India’s Prime Minister publicly “welcomed President Trump’s leadership” in the evolving Gaza peace framework, in a statement marking “decisive progress.”

UAE: Reuters reported that the United Arab Emirates “presses Netanyahu to back Trump Gaza plan, warns against West Bank annexation.” That coverage shows the UAE is actively advocating for the plan’s acceptance.

Other states in the White House list: The White House document also names Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Qatar, Egypt (in addition to UAE, Pakistan, Türkiye, Indonesia) as foreign ministers who “welcome” the plan.

A PBS interview with a former Middle East negotiator remarks both Israel and Hamas have sounded “positive” but “much is unresolved.”

Wikipedia’s page on the “Donald Trump’s September 2025 Gaza Strip proposal” (which is of course secondary and open to revision) lists as “met with support” the following states: France, Germany, Russia, Spain, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, United Kingdom.

Categories: Robert Clifton Robinson