When beginning a conversation with those who identify themselves as an atheist, the common objection that is stated for their unbelief in God is the assertion that there is no evidence which proves His existence.
When this statement is made, we must ask: “what kind of evidence are you looking for?
The atheist will usually tell you: “empirical, scientific, testable, evidence.”
This declaration leaves the intelligent person quite perplexed. The evidence for God is quite overwhelming. It becomes clear during these conversations with the atheist that evidence is not the real hindrance to their unbelief. We find that the will of the person had firmly entrenched the mind into a refusal to acknowledge evidence, even when it is compelling and empirical. This plight is very common amongst the human species and can be observed in several similar circumstances. The will is often dictated by the heart. When the heart is unyielding or unwilling to accept facts which are contrary to the will, the heart will refuse to accept these facts. A person who has determined in advance, what the results will be, cannot accept any evidence which violates their will.
The earth, the human species, and the universe itself, contains a vast array of empirical evidence which can be observed, tested, and received—fully validating the existence of God.
First, in order to accept that the universe and human life, which exists upon this planet, is the product of happenstance, one must be willing to acknowledge that highly technical machines can come into existence without the aid of an intelligence source. The universe is classified by physicists as the most technical machine in existence. Physicist Seth Lloyd, describes the universe as one giant quantum computer:
“The universe is the biggest thing there is and the bit is the smallest possible chunk of information. The universe is made of bits. Every molecule, atom, and elementary particle registers bits of information. Every interaction between those pieces of the universe processes that information by altering those bits. That is, the universe computes, and because the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics, it computes in an intrinsically quantum-mechanical fashion; its bits are quantum bits. The history of the universe is, in effect, a huge and ongoing quantum computation. The universe is a quantum computer.”
Essentially, lloyd asserts that the universe is made up of information. As any intelligent person understands, information comes from a mind. A computer cannot not create itself; a human mind conceived the idea, engineered the machine, then created and assembled the components which allow the machine to operate. Although computers in the future may have the capacity to create themselves, the origin of the first computer—which contained the knowledge of how to create other computers, came from a human mind. Where did the knowledge that is contained with the human mind originate from? God is the treasury from where all wisdom and knowledge originates.
The error that godless scientists espouse today, posits the idea that the universe is a complex machine that created itself. Intervention by a supernatural Being is not necessary, the universe and all life created itself—spontaneously.
This theory is similar to the atheist—theoretical physicists of late, who cannot explain the fine-tuning of our universe by any naturalistic cause. In an attempt to remove any possibility that an intelligent Being is responsible for the Cosmos, the newest hypothesis—described as the, “multiverse,” designates our universe as one of an infinite number of other parallel universes (which no one can see). If we have an unlimited number of universes, then we would certainly expect to find at least one like ours that is finely tuned for life. Although cosmologists do not have the ability to see beyond our own universe to test this theory, nevertheless, this has become the newest explanation for why the universe appears to be designed for life. This allows the atheist to make the assertion that God is not necessary as the source of our universe, since in their view, it came into existence by itself.
We begin to notice a pattern that has developed amongst scientists who are confronted with the massive evidence for creation by an Eternal Being: things can spontaneously generate themselves—given enough time.
The accepted method of science today, whereby life has come to planet earth, is the evolutionary process. Although no evolution from one species to another has ever been observed, much less tested, this theory remains the primary method by which the atheist asserts man’s existence—apart from God. It is well understood amongst scientists that evolution within species is observable and testable and remains a fact of science. Many species possess the capacity of adaptability to their environment. It is assumed by those who seek to posit evolution as the solution for life, accepting that evolution is a fact of species in their adaptability, it must also be true as the origin of life. This is a catastrophic error. There is no scientific evidence in the history of the world which validates that one particular species has evolved into a entirely different species. What we observe are complete genus which suddenly appeared on the earth, fully formed, without any evidence of evolution from a prior species.
This fact provides one of the primary and foundational principles for the existence of life as a result of an intelligent source. Since life cannot spontaneously generate itself and no species of animal has never been observed—evolving into new or more advanced species, creation by an intelligent Being is the only reasonable explanation for mankind and the universe itself.
Second, according to scientists, the universe began as a singularity—13.7 billions ago. During the first micro seconds of time, certain events transpired which required extreme precision. Had the universe began its expansion unaided, and continued unaided—allowing immense fortuity, the expansion of gases and distribution of matter—across space, would have been immensely different from what scientists observe today. It is a fact of science that carbon, which is necessary for life, requires the existence of stars. It is during the death of a first generation star that carbon is produced. Without distinct placement of matter in specific groups, evenly distributed through space, stars could not have formed. This even distribution of matter provided the necessary environment required to produce stars and galaxies. This fact of science is an empirical evidence, which validated the universe as originating by engineering—which demands an intelligent source. The laws of physics, which ordered the universe and made life possible billions of years later, requires a source of unlimited architectural power. It is impossible that the universe began by itself, and continued in its initial expansion—unaided. To the present day, no scientist can tell us how the universe came into existence at one specific moment, when nothing had previous existed. The laws of physics, although they are quite simple, represent a universe if immense technical reality.
The fact of the universe’s existence, the product of masterful intelligence—by a Being who possesses infinite power, is the only logical explanation for what we observe today. The universe could not come into existence on its own. There must be a reason, there must be a purpose, there must be a person who caused all that exists to be present today.
Third, those who study the human body and mind, acknowledge that it is a work of immense genius. The brain contains the human mind, the consciousness of a person, but these physical entities do not exist as the source of who we are. The person, the being that define who we are, is independent of our body and brain. We simply inhabit these bodies as vessels which allow us to convey to the world and other beings, our physical presence. When the spirit, which is the true person, departs the body, it ceases to exist. It is the spirit, the true person, which permits the body to continue.
Just as the universe and life itself, exist by a source outside themselves, the human body exists by a source outside itself.
It is by the things which exist all around us, that we can know for certain that God must exist. For without an unlimited and eternal Being as the source for what we perceive, life makes no sense at all. There must be a reason for this grand universe. We must exist for a purpose. There has to be a plan in effect, which is orchestrated and controlled by an immense power, greater than the material universe itself.
It was the intention of God that we discover Him by the things that He has made. We walk out into the sunshine on a beautiful day. We see the sky, the mountains, the trees, oceans, animals, and people. We realize how beautiful and intricate life is. We contemplate the vastness of this universe and the complex events that were required to make life possible. It is only logical that all we can see—came from a source of immense intelligence.
It is the position of God that He has left us with compelling and empirical evidence for His existence by the things that He has made.
“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse.” —Romans 1:20
On the day that we stand before our Creator and give an account for our life, we will not be able to utter the excuse that we didn’t know He exists. He knows, that we know—there is sufficient evidence to conclude that God must exist, by the things that He has made.
When the atheist declares that there is no evidence for God, we must stand in perplexity. How can an intelligent person see so much evidence, yet declare there is none?
Those who deny the existence of God when He is so clearly discerned, is like the man who, all of his life, sees his shadow cast upon the ground and imagines that the shadow exists because he exists. He never turns to see that the true source of his shadow is not from himself, but a power greater and more magnificent than anything he has ever imagined.
God is present in the world today. Although we cannot see Him, we see what He has done. We see the works of His hands, the universe, the earth, mankind, and all that exists. We see what He has achieved in the lives of those who know Him. We hear of the magnificent things He has accomplished in those who live for Him—events which have no naturalistic explanation, apart from an intervention of supernatural origin. I have objectively examined the evidence that is available over the course of the past 40 years and determined that the proof for the existence of God is overwhelming. I have spoken to thousands of people who claim that they cannot believe in God, for a variety of reasons. In every case, it was always a matter of their will—which refused to acknowledge compelling evidence that hindered their faith in God, not a lack of evidence. People do not believe in God because they do not want to believe. They will not impartially examine the evidence because they don’t want to see it. They know that the most efficient means whereby they can remain a non believer is to refuse to look at the evidence and consider Jesus from an unbiased mind.
In truth, the atheist creates an environment which permits him the perpetual existence of a life without God—by choice.
The fact of Jesus existence in history
Finally, the most compelling empirical evidence for God’s existence is the presence of Jesus of Nazareth on the earth. Despite the attempts of critics, not a single successful impeachment has been made upon the certainty of Jesus existence in Israel 2,000 years ago. The records of the Roman and Jewish governments—both hostile towards Jesus and completely unsympathetic to His cause, contain substantial accounts of His crucifixion and death.
Those who claim that the Jesus portrayed in the pages of the New Testament, is a myth, must ignore the vast evidence that exists from the Jewish Talmud. The ancient scribes of Israel who chronicled Jesus in their writings, had no interest in preserving any historical information about Him, nor Christianity. The Jews who recorded their commentary about Jesus in the Talmud, regarded Him and His followers as the latest of many cult religions of their day. These leaders of Israel had no desire to document the existence of Jesus, His crucifixion, nor those who followed Him—yet this is precisely what they accomplished by their adversarial comments regarding His arrest and execution. These records were written during the period of history in which Jesus is reported to have been in Israel, as described by the narrative of the New Testament scriptures.
Evidence From the Jewish Talmud
There can be no greater evidence of genuine testimony than that which originates from a hostile witness. Those who are not sympathetic to the passions or cause of a person or movement, prove by their hatred—the validity of the persons they malign.
The Talmud was not written for Christianity. It is purely Jewish in origin and contains commentary for the Hebrew scriptures. However, the Talmud does contain verifying evidence that the person described as Jesus of Nazareth in the New Testament narrative, was in fact, a real person from that period of history.
There can be no doubt that the references in the Talmud to Jesus, as confirmed by noted scholars such as Peter Schäfer, which on some occasions, do not reference Jesus by name, while describing the events and persons who are mentions in the New Testament, are in fact descriptions of the events that transpired in Jerusalem at the time the Gospels depict them. In the Rabbinic literature of the Babylonian Talmud, there are several passages which confirm the New Testament descriptions of Jesus as the son of Mary and her betrothed husband, Joseph, a carpenter. In the portions of the Talmud, Jesus is referred to as: “Ben Stada,” and “Ben Pandera” or “Ben Pantera.”
Seemingly insignificant passages such as these, found in the Talmud, may appear to the reader as minor mentions of Jesus. The facts are, these tiny references of Jesus, validate that He was in Jerusalem at the time described by the four gospels. That during this time, Jesus was arrested by the Sanhedrin and turned over to Pilate to be crucified.
The New Testament narrative has been authenticated by some of the world’s greatest literary scholars as an account written by honest men who were telling the truth about the events that transpired during Jesus life, death, and resurrection. The internal evidence of the four gospel accounts contains substantial records that have been carefully scrutinized by experts in fraud detection for centuries. The minor differences between the accounts of writers which described the events of Jesus presence here on earth, are not contradictions, but important evidence of authenticity. In matters of fraud, when a writer is seeking to deceive the reader—in an attempt to the prove the truthfulness of the story, the testimony of each witness—match the testimony of other witnesses, precisely. The fact that the writers of the four gospels recount the same events—while describing their own unique perspective—that is not mentioned by the other writers, is not evidence of fraud, but proof of authenticity.
The account of Judas hanging himself has been a source of constant ridicule by critics of the Bible. In fact, this particular narrative serves as one of the great proof texts for the authenticity of the Bible.
Internal evidence of the New Testament
An important point that actually serves greatly to authenticate the New Testament as a valid account of the life of Jesus Christ is the difference in testimony between Matthew and Peter’s narrative of Judas suicide. Matthew describes Judas as hanging himself in a tree after his betrayal of Jesus. Peter, in Acts chapter 1, describes Judas—falling head first into a field—with his intestines spilling out. Some critics of the Bible see this difference in the description of Judas death as a discrepancy that casts doubt on the reliability of the New Testament.
Judas was hanged
Matthew 27:3-5 Then Judas, His betrayer, seeing that He had been condemned, was remorseful and brought back the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, “I have sinned by betraying innocent blood.” And they said, “What is that to us? You see to it!” Then he threw down the pieces of silver in the temple and departed, and went and hanged himself.
Then Judas fell head first, his stomach bursting open
Acts 1:15-19 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples (altogether the number of names was about a hundred and twenty), and said, “Men and brethren, this Scripture had to be fulfilled, which the Holy Spirit spoke before by the mouth of David concerning Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus; for he was numbered with us and obtained a part in this ministry.” (Now this man purchased a field with the wages of iniquity; and falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out. And it became known to all those dwelling in Jerusalem; so that field is called in their own language, Akel Dama, that is, Field of Blood.)
Matthew says that Judas, “Hanged himself”.
Peter says that Judas “falling headlong, he burst open in the middle and all his entrails gushed out…”
We must remember that the words of the New Testament are the eye witness accounts of those who were either there when the events took place, or were recorded by others from the testimony of those who saw the events take place.
The accounts of Matthew and Peter do not conflict with each other, they are the record of the events which took place, as each of these men described different parts of the same event.
Matthew recounts how Judas hanged himself. Peter describes further details of this event where the rope that was used, apparently snapped and Judas fell into the rocks of the field below. This fall ruptured his stomach area, spilling out his intestines onto the ground. This is the reason the field was later called the “Field of Blood.”
When people are at the scene of an incident, they will often remember different details of the same event. It is common for a person who is interviewing eyewitnesses to hear added details that others who were present did not think of or say. These differences are understood by experts as consistent with the true events which took place.
As we observe this phenomenon in Matthew and Peter’s descriptions of Judas death, we understand that this brings great internal evidence to their testimony as valid and authentic accounts of the same event. There are no discrepancies between these two narratives; there are simply additional details given by Peter, which Matthew did not mention. If the story was a fabrication, those who wrote the fabrication would be careful to make sure that the accounts of all witnesses were the same, so as to remove any doubts about their authenticity.
A second objection of the same text by critics
Matthew records the prophecy of the Messiah’s betrayal coming from the prophet Jeremiah. The actual prophecy that Jesus fulfilled is from Zechariah.
Matthew 27:9-10 Then was fulfilled what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet, saying, “And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the value of Him who was priced, whom they of the children of Israel priced, 10 and gave them for the potter’s field, as the LORD directed me.”
Zechariah 11:13b …And the LORD said to me, “Throw it to the potter”—that princely price they set on me. So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them into the house of the LORD for the potter
The division of each scroll of the Old Testament into individual books did not take place until much later—after Matthew and Peter quoted from Zechariah and Jeremiah. At the time that the gospel of Matthew was recorded, the writings of Zechariah were included in the larger scroll of Jeremiah.
Jeremiah, being the more important of the two prophets—Matthew simply quoted from the scroll of Jeremiah where Zechariah’s prophecy was located.
When Matthew was trying to remember where the prophecy was written, he was doing so from memory and mistakenly thought it was in Jeremiah’s writing.
Very often as a pastor and Bible teacher, I will make this same mistake without realizing my error while I am teaching from the pulpit. I have often stated that a particular verse of scripture is located in a certain book, when in fact the verse came from a different book of the Bible. The text of the verse I am quoting was correct; I simply got the book wrong.
The fact that we observe this occurring in the gospels gives us a great reason to believe that the New Testament scriptures are genuine.
If a person was seeking to fabricate a lie and write a story to convince us, he would make sure that the details of his account were consistent with known sources. However, if a person was simply trying to recount the verse of scripture that he believed were fulfilled—much as I do when teaching on a Sunday morning before the congregation, he might miss quote the wrong book. This tells us that the details, which are written in Matthew 27:9, are a genuine account of what actually took place. This so-called “discrepancy” is not a valid reason to doubt the New Testament; in reality, it is a great reason to believe it.
Another possibility is that this verse does not specifically state that the prophecy was written in the scroll of Jeremiah; it says that it was “spoken by Jeremiah the prophet…” Zechariah may have recorded the words of Jeremiah who had originally spoken them.
When we investigate the New Testament in great detail, we find that the internal evidence which the writers have provided, gives us an abundance of clues to validate the authenticity of their narratives. The differences between Matthew and Peter’s account of Judas death, the mistaken quote of Matthew in describing Jeremiah as the source of Zechariah’s prophecy, all tell us that we have a true account of the events which they describe. We can have confidence that the life of Jesus Christ has been recorded for us—truthfully, by the actual people who saw and heard Him—witnessed His crucifixion and resurrection three days later, and testified that He is the fulfillment of all the Old Testament prophecies of the Messiah.
All historical events are confirmed by firsthand testimony
Virtually everything we believe regarding past history is because of the eyewitness testimony of those who were there at the time the events they recorded, took place. How do we know that George Washington and Abraham Lincoln were actual persons of history? We read the testimony of those who saw them, heard them, and then recorded these events for us. The man Jesus Christ is a real person from history whose life has been recorded for us by honest men who saw and heard the amazing things that He has said and done. There is more historical evidence for the birth, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ than any other person in the chronology of the world.
The four gospels as credible historical instruments
It has always been interesting to me that skeptics of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ refuse to accept the historical significance of the four gospels, because the testimony about Jesus being raised from the dead is from a religious document. The New Testament is not only an important religious document, it is a stunning record of historical events which took place in Palestine during the first century.
In regards to the New Testament and the facts that it reports to us in its narrative: Sir William Ramsey, world famous historian and renowned archeologist, describes the statements of the New Testament regarding the geographical and historical references it makes, as existing without a single error.
“I began with a mind unfavorable to (the accuracy of the New Testament) but more recently I found myself brought into contact with the Book of Acts as an authority for the topography, antiquities, and society of Asia Minor. It was gradually borne upon me that in various details the narrative showed marvelous truth.”
Dr. Ramsey believed, at the onset, that the accounts which are described in the Gospel of Luke and the Book of Acts were inaccurate. Over 100 years ago, he undertook an expedition to Asia to try and refute the New Testament, only to become so overwhelmed by the evidence that he became a follower of Jesus Christ.
“Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy…this author should be placed along with the very greatest historians.”
Archeological accuracy points to literary accuracy
Since Luke’s description of cities, names, places, and customs are perfect in their historical accuracy, it is certain that the accounts of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection are also accurate and reliable.
The fact that Luke has been confirmed as a scholarly historian of specific details regarding the history of the first century, it is certain that he also recorded for us, with the same precision, the specific events which transpired concerning the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Luke’s integrity as a historical scholar demands that we accept, with confidence, his testimony of Jesus’ resurrection, which is the foundation of the entire Christian church.
The Uniqueness of Jesus
Many have labeled Jesus as a great teacher, a prophet, the Messiah, even God. Let us examine what He said for ourselves and decide if He is worthy of further time and attention.
First, we know that Jesus is a historical person. No credible Biblical scholar today believes that Jesus was not a real person of history. The evidence for His existence is so overwhelming that to deny Jesus lived in Galilee at the time depicted in the New Testament, would place any writer in a classification of incompetency. Second, He said and did things that no one has ever said or done before. Third, about a Billion people on the earth right now are said to be His followers. For these three reasons alone, we should consider Him independent of the thoughts and opinions of skeptics, or those who have already decided who He is.
Examine the claims that Jesus made.
Determine by His words and works, who He is.
All religious men and women seek to direct us to a set of ideals, a religion, or a set of teachings. Jesus is unique, in that He consistently seeks to direct all of our attention to Himself.
Others seek to teach certain truths; Jesus said that He is the truth.
John 14:6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.”
Other religious leaders try to point us to the light; Jesus said He is the light.
John 8:12 Then Jesus spoke to them again, saying, “I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life.”
Others tell us where we can find satisfaction; Jesus said that only He can truly satisfy us.
John 6:51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world.
The various religions of the world try to tell us how we can have eternal life; Jesus said that He is the bestower of eternal life.
John 11:25 Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live.”
Normally, anyone who would make such brazen claims would be viewed as a person who is beyond eccentric; they would be classified as insane.
Jesus told the religious leaders of Israel that before Abraham was born, He existed.
John 8:58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.”
Jesus said that Moses and all the prophets were writing about Him in their prophecies.
Luke 24:44 Then He said to them, “These are the words which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me.”
When Jesus returned to His hometown of Nazareth, He went to the synagogue on the Sabbath. He was asked to read from the prophet Isaiah, to whom over 132 of the prophecies of this book were written. As He finished reading from Isaiah Chapter 61, Jesus handed the scroll back to the attendant and then said to those who were in the synagogue: “Today this scripture is fulfilled…”
Luke 4:20-21 Then He closed the book, and gave it back to the attendant and sat down. And the eyes of all who were in the synagogue were fixed on Him. 21 And He began to say to them, “Today this Scripture is fulfilled in your hearing.”
Jesus was claiming that all of the prophecies that Isaiah wrote about the coming Messiah were fulfilled by Him.
Often, we read in the Bible and by many other religious documents, that people are encouraged to believe in God. Jesus said that we should believe in Him. He claimed that—to reject Him is to forfeit eternal life.
1 John 5:12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.
Jesus said that we should not only believe in God, we should believe also in Him.
John 14:1 Let not your heart be troubled; you believe in God, believe also in Me.
We can stop here for just a moment. These are claims that are quite astounding considering that Jesus was only a simple carpenter from a small town in ancient Israel. If what Jesus said is true, then every person on the earth should consider Him. If He is deluded or a liar, His name should be stricken from the pages of all books ever written of Him. We cannot, however, ignore what He has said, and determine casually that He is not relevant to all the questions of life. Whether or not there is a God who has created and sustains this universe is not the issue at this point. Our dilemma is whether or not Jesus can substantiate and prove any of these claims that He has made about Himself. If He can, then He very well might be able to answer every other question regarding the mysteries of life and human existence.
Jesus did not encourage us to join a church, a religious organization, or follow a set of ideals; He commanded us to “follow Him.” He asserted that He is able to quench the insatiable desire that all human beings possess to be once and forever satisfied, in our innermost being; this is the constant and unrelenting pursuit of our life.
John 7:38 He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.
John 1:43 The following day Jesus wanted to go to Galilee, and He found Philip and said to him, “Follow Me.”
Jesus asserted that to follow Him was the most important decision that a person could ever make in their life. He declared that to reject His claim of Lordship over our lives was the greatest error we could ever commit.
Again, we are struck by the fact that this is not just a man who claims to be a great teacher of truth. He is claiming that He is the source of all truth. This is the reason that many people find Jesus so offensive. He does not afford us the opportunity to remain neutral in our determination of who He is; Jesus demands an answer.
1 John 5:12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.
The Bible asserts that the greatest commandment is to love God with all of our heart, soul, and mind. Jesus said that if we love anyone more than Him, we are not worthy of Him.
Matthew 10:37 He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.
At this point, most people might reach the limits of their tolerance. “No more, I cannot listen to another word—Love Jesus more than I love my own dear mother? That is unreasonable and ridiculous!”
These declarations sound like the ramblings of a sick man—the claims and demands of an ideologue. But what if we walk away now and forever ignore Jesus, what will be the end of our life if we find out later that all His claims are true? We will have missed out on the greatest treasure in the universe—to know the Creator of all things. Could these claims be true? Is it possible that everything Jesus said about Himself is factual?
Jesus said that He was the fulfillment of all the Old Testament prophecies who are written about one man who would be the only Savior of the world. He described His own death by crucifixion that would be the end of His life. He said that when He was “lifted up” on the cross, the stunning reality of His actions would draw all people to Him.
John 12:32 And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself.
The cross is a place of incredible polarization. People are either profoundly drawn to Jesus because of it, or they are exceedingly offended by it. People are attracted by the Love exhibited by what Jesus has done for us at the cross; while at the same time, repelled that we should be thought of as sinners which made the cross of Jesus a necessity.
Jesus was the most self-centered person who has ever lived.
Everything that He said and did in His short 33 ½ years of life was directed at drawing attention to Himself. At the same time, Jesus taught humility in all other people.
Luke 18:17 Assuredly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God (humbly) as a little child will by no means enter it.
He rebukes the men who had followed Him for their assertiveness in seeking an honored place in His kingdom.
Mark 10:35-40 Then James and John, the sons of Zebedee, came to Him, saying, “Teacher, we want You to do for us whatever we ask.” 36 And He said to them, “What do you want Me to do for you?” 37 They said to Him, “Grant us that we may sit, one on Your right hand and the other on Your left, in Your glory.” 38 But Jesus said to them, “You do not know what you ask. Are you able to drink the cup that I drink, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?”39 They said to Him, “We are able.” So Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink the cup that I drink, and with the baptism I am baptized with you will be baptized; 40 but to sit on My right hand and on My left is not Mine to give, but it is for those for whom it is prepared.”
Yet, when He speaks of Himself, He takes an entirely different approach.
Matthew 26:62-64 And the high priest arose and said to Him, “Do You answer nothing? What is it these men testify against You?” 63 But Jesus kept silent. And the high priest answered and said to Him, “I put You under oath by the living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God!” 64 Jesus said to him, “It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven.”
It is clear by the above statement that Jesus believed that He is the fulfillment of all Old Testament prophecies that speak of the Messiah. By using the title “Son of man” to describe Himself, Jesus is making it clear that He is the Messiah, “the Son of man,” whom Daniel described in His prophecy of the last days.
Daniel 7:13 I was watching in the night visions, And behold, One like the Son of Man, Coming with the clouds of heaven! He came to the Ancient of Days, And they brought Him near before Him.
Jesus also believed that His purpose in coming to earth was to fulfill the prophecies of Isaiah Chapter 53, which speak of the suffering servant who would die for the sins of all people. This single chapter of Isaiah contains 38 prophecies that vividly describe the suffering of the Son of man for the sins of all people. When these 38 prophecies are carefully examined in contrast to their counterpart scriptures in the New Testament, it is clear that Jesus was purposely fulfilling everything Isaiah wrote.
The following prophecies were written 700 years before Jesus was born.
Who will believe?
He will come from a poor family.
No Physical Beauty
He will be despised.
He will be rejected.
He is a man of sorrows.
They will hide from Him.
He will bear our griefs.
He will carry our sorrow.
Thought to suffer for His own sins.
He will pay for our sins.
He will make peace for us.
By His scourging, we are healed.
He will bear all our sins.
All our sins will be laid on Him.
He will be oppressed and afflicted.
He will not defend Himself.
Led as a Lamb to the slaughter.
He will be arrested.
His trials will be unjust.
He will be killed.
His life is the payment for our sins.
Buried in a rich man’s gravesite.
Accused, but innocent.
He will bear witness of the truth.
It pleased God to punish Him for us.
His life, an offering for our sins.
He will see those whom He has saved.
His salvation for us will succeed.
He will see His plan ahead of time.
He will come as the servant of God.
He will justify those who believe.
He will bear all of our sins.
His name will be exalted above all names.
He will pour out His life for us.
He will be killed with criminals.
He will bear the sins of the world.
He will pray for those who kill Him.
Peter came to the conclusion that Jesus was far more than just a prophet or great teacher in Israel.
Matthew 16:13-16 When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, saying, “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?” 14 So they said, “Some say John the Baptist, some Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.”15 He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” 16 Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
Many people had begun to wonder who Jesus was. Some thought that He was one of the Prophets. Peter believed that Jesus was the One that the prophets had predicted would come.
“Jesus was not just another signpost, but the destination to which the signposts had led.”—John Stott.
As we consider who Jesus is, we are confronted with who He believed Himself to be. In speaking of the prophecies of the Old Testament, Jesus described the events that were happening all around Him, as He conducted His ministry. He claimed to be fulfilling the very details that all the prophets had written so much about, but understood very little of.
Jesus often spoke in the veil of a parable, which hid closely below the surface, the deeper spiritual revelation of what the kingdom of God was truly about.
Matthew 13:13-17 Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. 14 And in them the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled (Prophecy 162, Isaiah 6:10), which says: “Hearing you will hear and shall not understand, And seeing you will see and not perceive; For the hearts of this people have grown dull. Their ears are hard of hearing, And their eyes they have closed, Lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I should heal them.” 16 But blessed are your eyes for they see, and your ears for they hear; 17 for assuredly, I say to you that many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.
Isaiah was predicting that the Messiah would teach by the use of Parables.
These stories from familiar images and situations of everyday life should have caused the people who heard them to dig deeper into the spiritual meaning behind what Jesus was saying. Because the hearts of the people were not seeking after God, the intended purpose of the parables that Jesus had taught was lost. Instead, those with unprepared hearts walked away from the Lord and missed their opportunity to obtain eternal life.
See the chapter in this book, “The Parables of the Messiah,” for more information.
Sin thrives in our indecision. The opportunity for eternal life and everlasting peace passes us by, because we have not opened up our hearts and minds to receive the truth that God is desiring to give us.
Again, we should not miss the fact that Jesus is not only constantly seeking to point people to Himself, but He is also consistently declaring that He is “the Son of man,” the Messiah, the One to whom all of the Old Testament prophecies were written.
Jesus claimed to be “The Son of man,” the Messiah. At the same time, He claimed to be “The Son of God” and equal to God Himself. We cannot ignore these claims, for they demand an answer. A good man, a sane man, does not say such things about himself—unless, of course, He is who He declared Himself to be.
Jesus Claimed to be the Creator of the universe.
More important than the question of His identity as the Messiah is the belief that Jesus had claimed that He is the Creator/God of the universe.
The Bible reveals a unique and exclusive relationship between Jesus—who claimed to be the Son of God—the Father, and the Holy Spirit. These three are all described in the Bible as being “One God.” They are eternally existent, with no beginning or first cause. John begins his account of Jesus by stating that in the beginning, Jesus (the Word) was with God and was God.
See the chapter: “One God, Three Persons.”
When Jesus spoke of His special relationship with God as His Father, He did not describe this relationship in the same way that we would. Jesus calls Him “My Father.”
Matthew 10:32-33 Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. 33 But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven.
John 10:30 I and My Father are one.
John 14:11 Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me.
Jesus taught us to refer to God as “my Father.” Listen to how Jesus distinguishes between His relationship to God and ours, as He speaks to Mary Magdalene.
John 20:17 Jesus said to her, … “I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.”
Jesus did not say that He was ascending to “our Father.” He said “your Father.” Then He said that He was ascending to “My God” and “your God.” Can you see here that Jesus believed that His relationship with God was that of a Son, to whom all the scriptures refer to as “One God”? The concept of three distinct persons being “One God” is difficult for us to grasp as human beings. We attribute more than one of anything as being impossible to be only one. In the Book of Revelation, chapter 5, we see how these three distinct persons are illustrated as “One.”
Verse 1: Him who sat on the throne.
Verse 6: A Lamb in the midst of the throne.
Verse 6: The Spirit from within the throne.
Verse 7: The Lamb taking the scroll from “Him who sat on the throne.”
Revelation 5:1-7 And I saw in the right hand of Him who sat on the throne a scroll written inside and on the back, sealed with seven seals. 2 Then I saw a strong angel proclaiming with a loud voice, “Who is worthy to open the scroll and to loose its seals?” 3 And no one in heaven or on the earth or under the earth was able to open the scroll, or to look at it. 4 So I wept much, because no one was found worthy to open and read the scroll, or to look at it. 5 But one of the elders said to me, “Do not weep. Behold, the Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has prevailed to open the scroll and to loose its seven seals.” 6 And I looked, and behold, in the midst of the throne and of the four living creatures, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as though it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God sent out into all the earth. 7 Then He came and took the scroll out of the right hand of Him who sat on the throne.
We see just one throne in heaven. We see One God sitting on a single throne. We see a Lamb coming from the “midst of the throne of God.” We see Him who sat on the throne, having a scroll in His right hand. We see the Holy Spirit described as the Seven Spirits. However, we might struggle to understand One God, Three Persons. Here, we see all Three in Heaven, seated on a single throne.
The Holy Spirit, who is always invisible to us yet always present, is not declared or recognized. The Holy Spirit is seen as being a part of the Lamb as “the Seven Spirits” (Seven is completeness). It is the work of the Holy Spirit to exalt and magnify Jesus, not to exalt Himself. Nevertheless, the Holy Spirit is always spoken of as also being God.
Acts 5:3-4 But Peter said, “Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land for yourself? While it remained, was it not your own? And after it was sold, was it not in your own control? Why have you conceived this thing in your heart? You have not lied to men but to God.”
The relationship that Jesus claimed with God was that of a Son—equal to God. He made this clear by the language that He used in the four Gospels. When Philip asked Jesus to show him the Father, Jesus said: “He who has seen Me has seen the Father…”
John 14:9 Jesus said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and yet you have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father; so how can you say, ‘Show us the Father’?”
Jesus claimed that—to know Him was to know the one true and living God. To see Him was to see God. To believe in Him was to believe in the only Eternal God. Jesus said that unless a person receives Him as the only Savior of the world, they cannot be saved.
1 John 5:12 He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.
When Jesus began His dissertation with the Pharisees on the subject of Abraham, He said something that utterly shocked their sensibilities.
John 8:51 Most assuredly, I say to you, if anyone keeps My word he shall never see death.
If Jesus was seeking to gain their confidence, this sentence immediately turned them defensive. To intimate that He had authority greater than Abraham or one of the Old Testament prophets was utterly offensive.
John 8:52-53 Then the Jews said to Him, “Now we know that You have a demon! Abraham is dead, and the prophets; and You say, ‘If anyone keeps My word he shall never taste death.’ 53 Are You greater than our father Abraham, who is dead? And the prophets are dead. Who do You make Yourself out to be?”
Jesus then directs these leaders of Israel back to the fact of His eternity. In order to explain who He is, He had to define His true origin.
John 8:56-59 “Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.” 57 Then the Jews said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?” 58 Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.” 59 Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.
Whatever courtesies the Jews might have extended to Jesus up to this point, they were now ready to stone Him to death. Jesus had not simply claimed greater authority over the words of Abraham, He now took for Himself the eternal name for God—“I AM.”
By claiming this title, Jesus was stating that He was the voice of God from the burning bush, in the Book of Exodus, that spoke to Moses.
Exodus 3:13-14 Then Moses said to God, “Indeed, when I come to the children of Israel and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they say to me, ‘What is His name?’ what shall I say to them?” 14 And God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM.” And He said, “Thus you shall say to the children of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to you.’ ”
We must pause now to consider where we are at, in the discussion of “who Jesus is.”
Many people—when they arrive at this destination where they realize that Jesus was claiming to be the eternal God—they can go no further. When a man claims to be God, we have reached the limits of reason.
It was because Jesus claimed to be the eternal God, that many Jews today cannot receive Him as the Messiah. The traditions of the elders in Jerusalem determined that the Messiah would be only a man, like the Old Testament prophets. This is puzzling, since there is such a large body of Hebrew prophecies which describe the Messiah as “God.”
The Messiah will be God in Human Flesh.
The following Old Testament Prophecies described the Messiah as being “God”:
The Messiah will be the Great “I AM” of the Old Testament.
The Messiah will be the eternal one who made all things.
The Messiah existed eternally as God; but from eternity, in His wisdom, decided that He would offer His life for the sins of all men.
The Messiah will come to Earth and be called “Mighty God.”
The Messiah will be presented to Israel as “Your God.”
The Messiah shall be referred to as “The first and the last.”
The Messiah shall be a descendant of David, who is called “THE LORD, OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.”
The Messiah will be both David’s Son and God’s Son, a King and the great Jehovah God who created the universe.
The common people knew that the Messiah was the LORD, Jehovah.
The nation of Israel and the Jews will finally “look upon” the crucified One and understand that He is their Messiah, their God.
In the gospel of John Chapter 8:58, we see the leaders of Israel take up stones to kill Jesus for His statement, “Before Abraham was, I AM.” According to the law of Moses, a man who claimed to be God has committed Blasphemy and should be stoned to death. There is only One God, and no man could take this title for himself. The problem was—Jesus was no ordinary man; He was God dwelling within the body of a man, which was the prediction of Isaiah Chapter 7, “Immanuel, God with us,” Prophecy 165. Isaiah was not simply predicting that God would be on our side, He would come to earth to live amongst us as God.
Can you imagine a person who has been described as a wonderful and gracious teacher, who then comes to sit before you and claim that He is the eternal God? What would your reaction be? Most people would quickly end the conversation and walk away in shock and dismay. Not many would care to continue a discussion with anyone who claims to be God. When we put ourselves in the place of the leaders in Israel, would we have reacted any differently?
The problem for these leaders is that although they were appointed to be the teachers of the Law of God, they apparently were not very well taught themselves.
It is important to understand that a large body of the Old Testament prophecies about the Messiah describe Him as being “The Son of God.”
The Messiah will be the Son of God.
There are seven Old Testament prophecies that either state or allude to the fact that the Messiah will be the “Son of God.” The seventh, although not referring directly to the “Son,” is generally understood to be a Messianic prophecy, describing the coming of God’s Son and those who are waiting for Him.
2 Samuel 7:14 “I will be his Father, and he shall be My son.”
1 Chronicles 17:13 “I will be his Father, and he shall be My son…”
Psalms 2:7 “I will declare the decree: The LORD has said to Me, ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You.’ ”
Psalms 89:26 He shall cry to Me, “You are my Father, My God, and the rock of my salvation.”
Proverbs 30:4 Who has ascended into heaven, or descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has bound the waters in a garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name, and what is His Son’s name, If you know?
Isaiah 9:6-7 For unto us a Child is born, Unto us a Son is given; And the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God.
Isaiah 33:2 O LORD, be gracious to us; We have waited for You.
With such a great witness to the Messiah being the “Son of God, why do many Jews today find that it is impossible to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, because He claimed to be the Son of God?
Clearly, it was the intention of the Old Testament scriptures to inform us that the Messiah would be God’s Son. When Jesus referred to Himself as The Son of God, He was firmly stating that He was the one to whom all the Old Testament prophecies of the Bible were written. Which Son was Isaiah referring to, in chapter 9:6-7, if not God’s Son? In the context of this verse, Isaiah writes that this “Son” is the “Mighty God.” See Prophecy 171.
Further proof of Jesus’ claim that He is God was His bold assertion that He is able to forgive sins. All of us can and should forgive the sins of those who hurt, offend, or take advantage of us. We cannot, however, speak for God and forgive the sins that are committed against God (All sins are committed against God, whether directly or indirectly). In Jesus stating that certain individual’s sins were forgiven, He was forgiving sins committed against God.
Mark 2:5-7 When Jesus saw their faith, He said to the paralytic, “Son, your sins are forgiven you.” 6 And some of the scribes were sitting there and reasoning in their hearts, 7 “Why does this Man speak blasphemies like this? Who can forgive sins but God alone?”
Luke 7:36-49 Then one of the Pharisees asked Him to eat with him. And He went to the Pharisee’s house, and sat down to eat. 37 And behold, a woman in the city who was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at the table in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster flask of fragrant oil, 38 and stood at His feet behind Him weeping; and she began to wash His feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hair of her head; and she kissed His feet and anointed them with the fragrant oil… 48 Then He said to her, “Your sins are forgiven.” 49 And those who sat at the table with Him began to say to themselves, “Who is this who even forgives sins?”
An interesting perspective on the woman who had committed many sexual sins and was forgiven by Jesus is the implied principle that sexual sin is a personal affront to God. What we do with our bodies in committing sin are not innocent acts, limited only to ourselves; they offend God who made our bodies for Him and Holy living.
It is at this point that we must ask the question, “Who is Jesus?”
We are compelled to make a decision. Either Jesus is God, or He is not. Either He has the right to forgive sins, or He does not. The importance of this subject is observed by the claims that Jesus makes and the answers that we must give for who we believe that He is. If Jesus is the eternal God of the universe, then we must decide whether or not we are willing to submit our lives to Him as Lord and Savior. If He is not God, then we must forever put out of our mind any further consideration of Him.
When the men who had been following Jesus were confronted with the question of who He was, they were also compelled to decide His true identity. When Jesus presented the hard questions that demanded an answer as to His true identity, many people simply walked away and no longer followed Him.
Others asked Jesus what they must do to please God. Jesus said, “Believe in Me.”
John 6:28-29 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?” 29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”
In the question of Moses providing bread for the children of Israel in the desert, Jesus said that He was the bread which came down from heaven. He claimed to be the answer to the question of meaning and purpose in life.
John 6:35 And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst.”
Jesus claimed to be the single source for eternal life.
John 6:40 And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
The Jews could not reconcile the fact that Jesus was claiming to be the eternal God, because they knew that He was the son of Joseph and Mary, from Nazareth.
John 6:41-42 The Jews then complained about Him, because He said, “I am the bread which came down from heaven.” 42 And they said, “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that He says, ‘I have come down from heaven’?”
Jesus continues His claims by stating—to believe in Him is to have eternal life. He claimed that a person must “eat His flesh and drink His blood” in order to have eternal life.
John 6:47-56 “Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life. 48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and are dead. 50 This is the bread which comes down from heaven, that one may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world.” 52 The Jews therefore quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?” 53 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. 54 Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. 55 For My flesh is food indeed, and My blood is drink indeed. 56 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.”
Jesus meant that eternal life does not come by a casual acknowledgment of Him. As a person eats or drinks—whatever they partake of becomes a part of every cell of their body—so also must we take Jesus into every fiber of our being, to make Him our life.
The Catholic church missed this deep spiritual meaning and took only the outward physical words of Jesus. Catholic doctrine states that the bread is the literal body of Jesus, and the wine is the literal blood of Jesus. This in not at all what Jesus intended. He was not concerned with outward physical acts, but the inward transformation of the heart and mind to belong completely to Him. In the same verse, Jesus said that these things (eating His flesh and drinking His blood) were “spiritual” examples of the need to make salvation personal.
Those who heard Jesus say these things also had a very difficult time understanding what He meant. Without carefully considering who Jesus was and exactly what He meant, they gave up and walked away.
John 6:60-61 Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this, said, “This is a hard saying; who can understand it?” 61 When Jesus knew in Himself that His disciples complained about this, He said to them, “Does this offend you?
Many people today are offended by Jesus’ statement that He is the only way to heaven. They are further insulted by the fact that He called us all “sinners,” with no hope of eternal life, apart from His Salvation. Those who heard Him say these things 2,000 years ago could not receive Him—even as many today also find it impossible to accept that Jesus is God and the only Savior of the world.
John 6:66 From that time many of His disciples went back and walked with Him no more.
When Jesus asked the twelve men, who had been following Him for three years, if they would also leave Him—Peter answered with the most important question of life: “Where else can we go? Only You have the words of eternal life.”
John 6:67-68 Then Jesus said to the twelve, “Do you also want to go away?” 68 But Simon Peter answered Him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. 69 Also we have come to believe and know that You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
After deeply considering who Jesus really was, Peter determined that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God.
Matthew 16:16 Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.”
Finally, in the most profound and undeniable proof for who He is, Jesus kept His promise and rose from the dead on the third day after He was brutally crucified. This is an event which is proven by eyewitness testimony and has never, in 2,000 years, been impeached. The resurrection of Jesus Christ is the most substantiated event in the history of the world. The reason today that the world still highly elevates Jesus as the Savior of the world is that—2,000 years ago, He rose from the dead; and this fact is proven by time and the record of antiquity.
With just the evidence presented in this single article, there is sufficient evidence for any reasonable person to seriously consider Jesus as a valid candidate to prove the existence of God. Jesus said that He came to earth for the express purpose of revealing who God is. He said that He came to this planet to take our place at the judgement of God and pay for all of our sins—Himself. He said that any person who believes this, can know for certain that God has forgiven them and that they have the certainty of eternal life, from the moment they receive Him.
There has never been anyone like Jesus during the history of the world. His life, death, and resurrection have been recored for us by the honest men who were just as surprised at who Jesus really is, as we are when we first encounter Him. It is the singularity of Jesus presence here on the earth, and the person that He is—which will convince anyone that everything He said is the truth. Investigate the words of Jesus for yourself. Just read through the gospel of John in the New Testament and see what you think. Read with a mind that is sincere, honestly searching for truth, and you will find it. All that John wrote was for the purpose of convincing you that Jesus is the Son of God and that by believing in Him, you can also have eternal life.
You might also be interested in the following articles:
The Overwhelming Empirical Evidence for Jesus Death and Resurrection
All Time and History Itself is Marked By Jesus Life, Death, and Resurrection
The New Testament Passes Every Literary Test of History
Jesus Claimed that He is Proof–God Exists
Empirical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ
Why Jesus is the Only Way to Heaven
The Historical Record of Jesus Life from Secular Sources
The Historicity of Jesus from the Talmud and Josephus
The preceding is from the new book: “The Prophecies of the Messiah,” by Robert Clifton Robinson. A 3,000 page treatise on the 365 Messianic Prophecies that Jesus fulfilled. Now available at Amazon.com
 Lloyd, Seth (2006-03-14). Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos (p. 3). Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
 Robinson, Robert Clifton. Yeshu: The Historical Jesus (Kindle Locations 317-325). Teach The Word Ministries, Inc. Kindle Edition.
 The following are specific references to Jesus of Nazareth, as found in the Talmud under passages on execution in Sanhedrin 43 a-b.1
Herzog 1: On the eve of Passover, they hanged Jesus the Nazarene.
Vatican 130: He went and brought up Jesus the Nazarene.
Vatican 140: He went and brought up Jesus.
Munich 95: On the eve of the Passover, they hanged Jesus of Nazareth.
Firenze 11.1.8-9: On the Sabbath eve and the eve of Passover, they hanged Jesus the Nazarene.
Karisruhe 2: On the eve of Passover, they hanged Jesus the Nazarene.
Barco: On the eve of Passover, they hanged Jesus of Nazareth.
1 English translations of the Talmud from Peter Schäfer, pp 133–140
 Peter Schäfer, Jesus in the Talmud (Kindle Locations 313-318). Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.
 1.Grant, M., Jesus: An Historian’s Review of the Gospels New York: Scribner’s, 1977, Page 176
2.Van Daalen, D. H., The Real Resurrection, London: Collins, 1972, Page 41
3.Kremer, Jakob, Die Osterevangelien — Geschichten um Geschichte, Stuttgart: Katholisches Bibelwerk, 1977, Pages 49-50
 William M. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveler and the Roman Citizen, 1982, page 8
 William M. Ramsay, The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament, 1915, page 222
 Robert E. Van Voorst Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence Eerdmans Publishing, 2000. ISBN 0-8028-4368-9 page 16 states: “biblical scholars and classical historians regard theories of non-existence of Jesus as effectively refuted”
James D. G. Dunn “Paul’s understanding of the death of Jesus” in Sacrifice and Redemption edited by S. W. Sykes (Dec 3, 2007) Cambridge University Press ISBN 052104460X pages 35-36 states that the theories of non-existence of Jesus are “a thoroughly dead thesis”
The Gospels and Jesus by Graham Stanton, 1989 ISBN 0192132415 Oxford University Press, page 145 states : “Today nearly all historians, whether Christians or not, accept that Jesus existed”.
Categories: "No proof for Jesus Resurrection", Agnostics and Skeptics, Atheists, Common objections by Atheists, Origin of the Universe, Science and the Bible, Secular Sources for Jesus
Please see, "Guidelines For Debate," at the right-side menu. Post your comment or argument here: